Subjectivism: I believe/want p to be true, therefore p.
Examples:
“God must exist because I couldn’t live if he didn’t”
“Barbie (2023) is a great movie because it made me laugh and kept my interest”
“My brother would never do that.”
“This person is guilty because I think they look suspicious”,
aka: Fallacy of Appeal to One’s Own Emotions/Beliefs
Appeal to Majority: A majority thinks p is true, therefore p.
Examples:
“Buying slaves is good because nearly every successful country bought slaves.”
“All the other countries are providing universal healthcare, and therefore the US should too.”
“A majority of Americans believe we should kill homeless people for sport.”
“This product gets 5 stars, so it must be good”
Appeal to Audience Emotion: Lots of emotional language but no evidence, therefore p.
Examples:
“We must kick out the rapists and murders crossing the border”
“They are stealing hardworking American’s jobs”
aka: Appeal to the mob (Ad Populum), Appeal to Pity
Appeal to Force: I’ll do something bad to you if you don’t accept p, therefore p is true.
Examples:
“If you write something that I disagree with, I will grade you harshly”
“This is a good rule because you’ll be punished if you don’t follow it”
Ad Hominem: A bad person is advocating p, therefore p is false, or their argument is bad.
Examples:
“Don’t vote for this proposition because trial lawyers support it”
“You’re just saying that because you own a daycare”
Special Case: Poisoning the Well (argument is bad because proposer has a vested interest)
Special Case: You, Too Fallacy (you also do this)
Special Case: Abusive ad hominem
B. Inductive Fallacies
Appeal to Authority: A respected person says p, therefore p.
Note: Only a fallacy if the person fails tests for reliable testimony.
Examples:
“It’s true because it’s in the Bible.”
False Dichotomy: Either p or q. Not q, therefore p.
Post hoc: p came before q, therefore p caused q.
Note: This is a special case of correlation \ne causation
Hasty Generalization: One or a few things show p, therefore p
Accident: We have a generalization and falsely apply it to prove p
Note: This is the reverse of hasty generalization (hasty instantiation?)
Example:
“A player has 20 seconds to serve starting from the end of the last point in a Tennis game. The player fell down and got injured in the last point and 20 seconds have passed, therefore that player has lost a point.”
Slippery Slope: Action P \to Q \to R \to S, therefore we shouldn’t do P.
C. Fallacies of Presumption and Diversion
Circular Argument: p is true because it’s true
Equivocation: … W … is true because ….W … (where W has two different meanings)
Appeal to Ignorance: p is true because you haven’t disproved p
Why: The burden of proof is on the person making the claims.