Formal Logic

Formal Logic: The study of reasoning, specifically whether something is true or false.

• Foundation for organized and careful method of thinking that characterizes reasoned activity.
• Applications of Formal Logic:
  • Programming languages based on logic (prolog)
  • Proving a program will perform the way as it is designed.

Statement

Statement / Proposition: A sentence that is either true or false.

• We often use statement letters to represent statements, using letters near the beginning of the alphabet

Examples of Valid Statements (crossed-out aren’t valid):

• “All mathematician wear sandals”
• “5 is greater than -2”
• “Where do you live?”
• “Are you a cool person?”
• “Anyone who wears sandals is an algebraist”

Logic

Logical methods are used to prove that programs do what they are designed to do.

Example of a Logically-Sound Proof/Derivation:

1. All mathematicians wear sandals
2. Anyone wears sandals is an algebraist
3. Therefore, all mathematicians are algebraists

Binary Connectives

• Logical Connective (\land): “And” statement
  • e.g., A \land B is the conjunction of A and B. A and B are the conjuncts
• Logical Disjunction (\lor): “Or” statement
  • e.g., A \lor B is the disjunction of A and B. A and B are the disjuncts
• Logical Negation (\neg, `): “Negation” statement; “Not” statement

Example of Logical Connective and Disjunction:

A	B	A \land B	A \lor B
T	T	T	T
T	F	F	T
F	T	F	T
F	F	F	F

• Logical Implication (\rightarrow): “If Then” statement; “A implies B” statement
  • e.g., A \rightarrow B is the implication of A and B. A is the antecedent/hypothesis statement and B is the consequent/conclusion statement
    • By convention, if A is false, we say A \rightarrow B is true because we can’t claim it was false
• Equivalence Connective (\leftrightarrow): “Equals” statement; “If and only if” statement
  • Unlike \land, \lor, or \rightarrow, this connective isn’t actually a fundamental connective. We can represent equivalence with (A \rightarrow B) \land (B \rightarrow A)

Example of Logical Implication and Equivalence Connective:

A	B	A \rightarrow B	B \rightarrow A	(A \rightarrow B) \land (B \rightarrow A)
T	T	T	T	T
T	F	F	T	F
F	T	T	F	F
F	F	T	T	T

Truth Table

Truth Table: Table that displays the truth values of a statement which correspond to the different combinations of truth values for the variables.

General Structure of a Truth Table:

• First columns list all possible values of the statement letters
  • For n statement letters, there will be 2^n rows
• Intermediate columns list intermediate steps
• Last columns list all possible values of the statement(s)

How-To Make a Truth Table:

1. Create columns:
   1. Start with statement variables (A, B, etc.)
   2. Intermediate values (parts of the well-formed formula)
      • Use personal taste for how much you want to split up the problem
   3. End with the target well-formed formula.
2. List all truth value combinations for statement variables
   • For n statement variables, there should be 2^n rows
3. Solve for each row.

Note: Truth tables get graded in the test/homework by whether the target truth values are correct

• Points won’t get taken off for a lack of intermediate values.
  • However, if the target truth value is wrong, the intermediate values will be used to give partial credit

Tautological Equivalence between \rightarrow and \lor

A \rightarrow B and A` \lor B are tautologically equivalent

Proof: Truth table for A \rightarrow B \equiv A` \lor B

A	B	A \to B	\lnot A \lor B
T	T	T	T
T	F	F	F
F	T	T	T
F	F	T	T

Well-Formed Formula (WFF)

Well-Formed Formula: A combination of letters, connectives, and parenthesis in a meaningful expression.

Priority of Connectives

1. Innermost Parenthesis (progress outwards)
2. Negation (\lnot)
3. Conjunction (\land)
4. Disjunction (\lor)
5. Implication (\rightarrow)
6. Equivalence (\leftrightarrow)

De Morgan’s Laws

De Morgan’s Law: A pair of transformation rules to negate statements

Examples:

• ( A \lor B ) \leftrightarrow A' \land B'
• ( A \land B )' \leftrightarrow A' \lor B'

How-To Apply De Morgan’s:

• A to \lnot A
• \land to \lor, and vice versa.

Hint: If you need to negate a statement with a \to in it, remember that A \rightarrow B \equiv A` \lor B

Tautology and Contradiction

Note: To simplify statements, we use letters near the end of the alphabet, by convention usually P and Q.

• e.g., ( A \land B )' \rightarrow A' \lor B' getting rewritten as P \rightarrow Q

Tautology: A well-formed formula that is always true.

Contradiction: A well-formed formula that is always false.

Note: Mathematicians call tautologies and contradictions “intrinsically true” and “intrinsically false”, respectively.

Tautological Equivalence

Logical Equivalence: Two statements are logically equivalent if, and only if, they have identical truth for every possible combination of statement variables.

We can write logical equivalence with \Leftrightarrow and \equiv, like so:

• P \Leftrightarrow Q
• P \equiv Q

Common Equivalences

Further Explanation:

• Component: If you combine two statements that are the inverse of each other, you may cover all cases or none of them.
• Identity: True || False === True, True && True === True

Statements in Programs

Conditional statements in programming use logical connectives with statements.

• e.g., This pseudocode:

if (outflow > inflow) and not (pressure 1000)
    do something;
else
    do something else

In-Class Exercises

Exercise I: Negation

Problem: Negate the following statements:

1. If the processor is fast, then the printer is slow (A \to B)
2. Either the processor is fast or the printer is slow (A \lor B)

Solution:

1. Change “if then” to “or”, then apply De Morgan’s law \begin{align} (A &\to B)' \\ (A' &\lor B)' \\ A &\land B' \\ \end{align}
2. Just apply De Morgan’s directly: (A \lor B)' \equiv A' \land B'

Answers:

1. The processor is fast and the printer is not slow.
2. The processor is not fast and the printer is not slow

Exercise II: Rewriting into Statement Variables

Problem: Translate the following using statement letters A, T, and E.

• “Tax rates will be reduced only if Anita wins the election and the economy remains strong”

Solution:

1. Let the statement variable be defined as:
   • A: “Anita wins the election”
   • T: “Tax rates will be reduced”
   • E: “Economy remains strong”
2. “Tax rates will be reduced (T) only if Anita wins the election (A) and the economy remains strong (E)”
3. “T only if ( A and E )”
4. T \rightarrow (A \land E)

Notes:

• “only if” is unidirectional (\rightarrow)
• “if and only if” is bidirectional (\leftrightarrow)